1984 Audi 200 vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz M
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz M is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 200 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz M is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz M weights approximately 870 kg more than 1984 Audi 200.
Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mercedes-Benz M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Audi 200 | 2013 Mercedes-Benz M | |
| Make | Audi | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 200 | M |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 298 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 2130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4804 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2141 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1796 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2915 mm |
