1984 Audi 4000 vs. 1956 Cadillac 6239D
To start off, 1984 Audi 4000 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Cadillac 6239D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Cadillac 6239D would be higher. At 5,972 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Cadillac 6239D is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Cadillac 6239D (285 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1984 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Cadillac 6239D should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 4000.
Because 1984 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Cadillac 6239D. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Cadillac 6239D (543 Nm) has 406 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 1956 Cadillac 6239D will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Audi 4000 | 1956 Cadillac 6239D | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 4000 | 6239D |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 5972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 285 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 543 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.2 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 92.1 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3280 mm |
