1984 Audi 4000 vs. 1962 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1984 Audi 4000 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1984 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 4000.
Because 1984 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac DeVille (582 Nm) has 445 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 4000 | 1962 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 4000 | DeVille |
Year Released | 1984 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 582 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79.2 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 98.4 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3300 mm |