1984 Audi 4000 vs. 1965 Jaguar MK II
To start off, 1984 Audi 4000 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Jaguar MK II (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1984 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Jaguar MK II should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 4000.
Because 1984 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Jaguar MK II. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Jaguar MK II (195 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 1965 Jaguar MK II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 4000 | 1965 Jaguar MK II | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | 4000 | MK II |
Year Released | 1984 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 195 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2900 mm |