1984 Audi 4000 vs. 1978 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1984 Audi 4000 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Cadillac Eldorado (171 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1984 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 4000.
Because 1984 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Cadillac Eldorado (433 Nm) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 1978 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Audi 4000 | 1978 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 4000 | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 6964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 171 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 433 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.2 mm | 103.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 103.1 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3210 mm |
