1984 Audi 4000 vs. 1996 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 1996 SsangYong Korando is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 SsangYong Korando (216 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1984 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 4000.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 SsangYong Korando (307 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 1996 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Audi 4000 | 1996 SsangYong Korando | |
| Make | Audi | SsangYong |
| Model | 4000 | Korando |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 216 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 307 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.2 mm | 89.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 84 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1850 mm |
