1984 Audi 4000 vs. 1996 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1996 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 2,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota 4Runner (123 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1984 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 4000.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota 4Runner (295 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 1996 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 4000. 1984 Audi 4000 has automatic transmission and 1996 Toyota 4Runner has manual transmission. 1996 Toyota 4Runner will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Audi 4000 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 4000 | 1996 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 4000 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1984 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 295 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79.2 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 103 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |