1984 Audi 4000 vs. 2000 Bristol Blenheim
To start off, 2000 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Bristol Blenheim (350 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 250 more horse power than 1984 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 4000.
Because 1984 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Bristol Blenheim. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Bristol Blenheim (500 Nm) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2000 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Audi 4000 | 2000 Bristol Blenheim | |
| Make | Audi | Bristol |
| Model | 4000 | Blenheim |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 5898 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2910 mm |
