1984 Audi 4000 vs. 2002 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2002 Toyota Mark II is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1984 Audi 4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Mark II (157 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1984 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 4000.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Mark II (200 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 4000 | 2002 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 4000 | Mark II |
Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 200 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79.2 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 75 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |