1984 Audi 4000 vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1984 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 4000.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (205 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Audi 4000 | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | 4000 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 205 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.2 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 94 mm |
| Top Speed | 168 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2680 mm |
