1984 Audi 4000 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Epica (154 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1984 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 4000.
Because 1984 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chevrolet Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Epica (237 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 4000 | 2006 Chevrolet Epica | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | 4000 | Epica |
Year Released | 1984 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 237 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79.2 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 89.2 mm |
Top Speed | 168 km/hour | 208 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2710 mm |