1984 Audi 4000 vs. 2012 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2012 Cadillac SRX is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac SRX (308 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1984 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 4000.
Because 1984 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Cadillac SRX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac SRX (359 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2012 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Audi 4000 | 2012 Cadillac SRX | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 4000 | SRX |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 308 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 359 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4834 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1669 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2807 mm |
