1984 Audi 4000 vs. 2012 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2012 Ford Falcon is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Falcon (265 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1984 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 4000.
Because 1984 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Falcon (409 Nm) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2012 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 4000 | 2012 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 4000 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 409 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79.2 mm | 92.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 99.3 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2838 mm |