1984 Audi 4000 vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (397 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 297 more horse power than 1984 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 4000.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (565 Nm) has 428 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Audi 4000 | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 4000 | ESCALADE |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 397 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 565 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.2 mm | 103 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 92 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5639 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2009 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1892 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3302 mm |
