1984 Audi 5000 vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1984 Audi 5000 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1984 Audi 5000. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 5000.
Because 1984 Audi 5000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 5000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 5000. (136 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 5000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Audi 5000 | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | 5000 | XK |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 3441 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 158 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 106 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2600 mm |
