1984 Audi 5000 vs. 1996 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1996 Lotus Elan is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 5000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 5000 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1984 Audi 5000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lotus Elan (163 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1984 Audi 5000. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 5000.
Because 1984 Audi 5000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 5000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lotus Elan (204 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 5000. (136 Nm). This means 1996 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 5000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Audi 5000 | 1996 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Audi | Lotus |
| Model | 5000 | Elan |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 163 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 204 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2260 mm |
