1984 Audi 5000 vs. 2002 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 5000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 5000 would be higher. At 3,390 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (158 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1984 Audi 5000. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 5000.
Because 1984 Audi 5000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 5000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 5000. (136 Nm). This means 2002 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 5000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Audi 5000 | 2002 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | 5000 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 3390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 158 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 271 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2450 mm |
