1984 Audi 5000 vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2002 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 5000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 5000 would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (112 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1984 Audi 5000. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 5000.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 5000. (136 Nm). This means 2002 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 5000.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 5000 | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 5000 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 112 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 270 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 16.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2540 mm |