1984 Audi 5000 vs. 2010 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2010 Toyota Tundra is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 5000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 5000 would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Tundra (276 HP) has 175 more horse power than 1984 Audi 5000. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 5000.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Tundra (424 Nm) has 288 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 5000. (136 Nm). This means 2010 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 5000. 2010 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 1984 Audi 5000 has manual transmission. 1984 Audi 5000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 5000 | 2010 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 5000 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 4664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 276 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 424 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3230 mm |