1984 Audi 5000 vs. 2012 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2012 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 5000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 5000 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan X-Trail (169 HP) has 68 more horse power than 1984 Audi 5000. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 5000.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan X-Trail (226 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 5000. (136 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 5000.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 5000 | 2012 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 5000 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 169 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 226 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2640 mm |