1984 Audi 80 vs. 1966 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1984 Audi 80 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1984 Audi 80. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 360 kg more than 1984 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 80. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1966 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 80 | 1966 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 80 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1984 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |