1984 Audi 90 vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1984 Audi 90 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,226 cc (5 cylinders), 1984 Audi 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Audi 90 (139 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (103 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Audi 90 should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Audi 90 weights approximately 84 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 Audi 90 (190 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (157 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1984 Audi 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 90 | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 90 | Celica |
Year Released | 1984 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 1972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 89 mm |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1176 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2620 mm |