1984 Audi 90 vs. 1982 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 1984 Audi 90 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 1,994 cc (5 cylinders), 1984 Audi 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Audi 90 (114 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Cressida. (104 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Audi 90 should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Cressida. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Cressida weights approximately 114 kg more than 1984 Audi 90.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 Audi 90 (168 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Cressida. (162 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1984 Audi 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Cressida.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 90 | 1982 Toyota Cressida | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 90 | Cressida |
Year Released | 1984 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 89 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1056 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2650 mm |