1984 Audi 90 vs. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 90 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (5 cylinders), 1984 Audi 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Audi 90 (114 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Audi 90 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 564 kg more than 1984 Audi 90.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 90. (168 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 90.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Audi 90 | 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | |
| Make | Audi | Chrysler |
| Model | 90 | ESX 3 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 168 Nm | 332 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1056 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3000 mm |
