1984 Audi 90 vs. 2000 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2000 Toyota Mark II is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 90 would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Mark II (276 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1984 Audi 90. (139 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 360 kg more than 1984 Audi 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Mark II (378 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 90. (190 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 90.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Audi 90 | 2000 Toyota Mark II | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | 90 | Mark II |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 139 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 378 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 71.5 mm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2710 mm |
