1984 Audi 90 vs. 2002 Eagle Talon
To start off, 2002 Eagle Talon is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 90 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Eagle Talon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Eagle Talon (209 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1984 Audi 90. (114 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Eagle Talon should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Eagle Talon weights approximately 364 kg more than 1984 Audi 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Eagle Talon (290 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 90. (168 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Eagle Talon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 90.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 90 | 2002 Eagle Talon | |
Make | Audi | Eagle |
Model | 90 | Talon |
Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 209 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 290 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1056 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2520 mm |