1984 Audi 90 vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 90 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1984 Audi 90. (139 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac STS weights approximately 552 kg more than 1984 Audi 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac STS (427 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 90. (190 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 90.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Audi 90 | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 90 | STS |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2226 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 139 HP | 320 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1812 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1844 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1463 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2957 mm |
