1984 Audi 90 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 90 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1984 Audi 90. (139 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 561 kg more than 1984 Audi 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 90. (190 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 90.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 90 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 90 | CTS |
Year Released | 1984 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 1821 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2880 mm |