1984 Audi 90 vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi 90 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (286 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1984 Audi 90. (139 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 854 kg more than 1984 Audi 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 90. (190 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 90.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi 90 | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | 90 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1984 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 286 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1260 kg | 2114 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4821 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2154 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1763 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2916 mm |