1984 Audi Coupe vs. 1946 Jeep CJ2A
To start off, 1984 Audi Coupe is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1946 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Audi Coupe (75 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1946 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Audi Coupe should accelerate faster than 1946 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Jeep CJ2A weights approximately 160 kg more than 1984 Audi Coupe.
Because 1946 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Audi Coupe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1946 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1946 Jeep CJ2A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi Coupe. (138 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1946 Jeep CJ2A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi Coupe | 1946 Jeep CJ2A | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | Coupe | CJ2A |
Year Released | 1984 | 1946 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2040 mm |