1984 Audi Coupe vs. 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1984 Audi Coupe is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 350 kg more than 1984 Audi Coupe.
Because 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi Coupe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi Coupe | 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Audi | Studebaker |
Model | Coupe | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1984 | 1962 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2980 mm |