1984 Audi Coupe vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1984 Audi Coupe is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1984 Audi Coupe. (75 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 190 kg more than 1984 Audi Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi Coupe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Audi Coupe | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Audi | Sunbeam |
| Model | Coupe | Tiger |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 4261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 27 L |
