1984 Audi Coupe vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1984 Audi Coupe is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,779 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Audi Coupe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Audi Coupe (90 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Audi Coupe should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Audi Coupe weights approximately 65 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Audi Coupe (145 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1984 Audi Coupe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi Coupe | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Audi | Riley |
Model | Coupe | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1984 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2380 mm |