1984 Austin Ambassador vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Austin Ambassador. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Austin Ambassador would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1984 Austin Ambassador. (83 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1984 Austin Ambassador.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Austin Ambassador. (131 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Austin Ambassador.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Austin Ambassador | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Ambassador | E-350 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1697 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 131 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2619 mm |