1984 Austin Maestro vs. 1951 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1984 Austin Maestro is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,953 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Maserati A6G (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1984 Austin Maestro. (66 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 1984 Austin Maestro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Maserati A6G weights approximately 185 kg more than 1984 Austin Maestro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Austin Maestro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Austin Maestro | 1951 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Austin | Maserati |
Model | Maestro | A6G |
Year Released | 1984 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1100 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2560 mm |