1984 Austin Maestro vs. 1960 Lotus Seven
To start off, 1984 Austin Maestro is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Austin Maestro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Austin Maestro (66 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Austin Maestro should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Seven.
Because 1960 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Austin Maestro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Austin Maestro | 1960 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Austin | Lotus |
Model | Maestro | Seven |
Year Released | 1984 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 29 L |