1984 Austin Montego vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1984 Austin Montego is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1984 Austin Montego. (67 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1984 Austin Montego. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1984 Austin Montego. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Austin Montego. (99 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1965 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Austin Montego.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Austin Montego | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Austin | Triumph |
Model | Montego | 2000 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1257 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 99 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 76 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |