1984 Austin Montego vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Austin Montego. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Austin Montego would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 285 more horse power than 1984 Austin Montego. (115 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1984 Austin Montego. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 701 kg more than 1984 Austin Montego. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Austin Montego, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (529 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 344 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Austin Montego. (185 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Austin Montego.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Austin Montego | 2003 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Montego | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1984 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 5666 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 185 Nm | 529 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 99.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.1:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1044 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2890 mm |