1984 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1953 Triumph TR2
To start off, 1984 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Triumph TR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Triumph TR2 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Triumph TR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Triumph TR2 weights approximately 234 kg more than 1984 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1953 Triumph TR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Triumph TR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Autobianchi A 112 | 1953 Triumph TR2 | |
Make | Autobianchi | Triumph |
Model | A 112 | TR2 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1953 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 963 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 90 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 173 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 894 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2250 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 56 L |