1984 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1960 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1984 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 963 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Autobianchi A 112 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Autobianchi A 112 weights approximately 280 kg more than 1960 Mazda R 360.
Because 1960 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Autobianchi A 112 | 1960 Mazda R 360 | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Mazda |
| Model | A 112 | R 360 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1960 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 963 cc | 355 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 16 HP |
| Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 80 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 2990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 1770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 55 L |
