1984 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1964 Volvo P 1800
To start off, 1984 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo P 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo P 1800 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Volvo P 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Volvo P 1800 weights approximately 430 kg more than 1984 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1964 Volvo P 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Volvo P 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Autobianchi A 112 | 1964 Volvo P 1800 | |
Make | Autobianchi | Volvo |
Model | A 112 | P 1800 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 963 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 97 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 45 L |