1984 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1976 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1984 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 925 kg more than 1984 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1976 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Autobianchi A 112 | 1976 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Autobianchi | Chevrolet |
Model | A 112 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1984 | 1976 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 963 cc | 5735 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2760 mm |