1984 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 1978 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1984 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,963 cc, 1978 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mazda RX-3 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1984 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1978 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Autobianchi A 112 | 1978 Mazda RX-3 | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Mazda |
| Model | A 112 | RX-3 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1978 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 963 cc | 1963 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 65 L |
