1984 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2002 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2002 Smart ForTwo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 963 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Autobianchi A 112 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 145 kg more than 1984 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2002 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Autobianchi A 112 | 2002 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Autobianchi | Smart |
Model | A 112 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 963 cc | 799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 40 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 135 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 22 L |