1984 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2002 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2002 Toyota Tundra is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1984 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2002 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Autobianchi A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Autobianchi A 112 | 2002 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Autobianchi | Toyota |
Model | A 112 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 963 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 3270 mm |