1984 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2005 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1070 kg more than 1984 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2005 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Autobianchi A 112 | 2005 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Autobianchi | Cadillac |
Model | A 112 | CTS |
Year Released | 1984 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 963 cc | 5663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 395 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 274 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 68 L |