1984 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2005 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2005 Ford Taurus is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Taurus weights approximately 845 kg more than 1984 Autobianchi A 112.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Ford Taurus has automatic transmission and 1984 Autobianchi A 112 has manual transmission. 1984 Autobianchi A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Ford Taurus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Autobianchi A 112 | 2005 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Autobianchi | Ford |
Model | A 112 | Taurus |
Year Released | 1984 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 963 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 201 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1505 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 68 L |