1984 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 531 kg more than 1984 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Autobianchi A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1984 Autobianchi A 112 has manual transmission. 1984 Autobianchi A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Autobianchi A 112 | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Mazda |
| Model | A 112 | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 963 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1191 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 76 L |
