1984 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2009 BMW M3
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Autobianchi A 112 | 2009 BMW M3 | |
| Make | Autobianchi | BMW |
| Model | A 112 | M3 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 963 cc | 3999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 414 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 63 L |
