1984 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2010 Acura TL
To start off, 2010 Acura TL is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Acura TL weights approximately 1028 kg more than 1984 Autobianchi A 112.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1984 Autobianchi A 112 has manual transmission. 1984 Autobianchi A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Autobianchi A 112 | 2010 Acura TL | |
Make | Autobianchi | Acura |
Model | A 112 | TL |
Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 963 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 280 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1688 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4966 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 70 L |